Prediction of Rosie Casals vs Eva Lundquist Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Casals vs E. Lundquist

Rosie Casals

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Eva Lundquist

SWE

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Casals 2 - 0 Lundquist

They have played 4 sets in total, with Rosie Casals winning 4 and Eva Lundquist winning 0. The last match between Rosie Casals and Eva Lundquist was at the Stockholm 2, 26-11-1969, Round: R4, Surface: Carpet, with Rosie Casals getting the victory 6-1 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Casals	2
Lundquist	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R4) Stockholm 2(11-26-69)

Stats

Rosie Casals

Eva Lundquist

(R2) US National Championships(08-30-67)

Stats

Rosie Casals

Eva Lundquist

R. Casals vs E. Lundquist H2H Profile

R. Casals	Stats	E. Lundquist
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
65.68% (819-428)	Career Total W/L	40.91% (63-91)
1	Grass	0
1	Indoor	0
2	Titles	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Casals vs E. Lundquist Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rosie Casals has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Eva Lundquist has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rosie Casals, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eva Lundquist has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Rosie Casals has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eva Lundquist has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Rosie Casals has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Eva Lundquist winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Rosie Casals has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 68% (W/L 133/62), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 200/102). Eva Lundquist has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 6/7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 5/12).
Player level: In the last year, Rosie Casals has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Eva Lundquist has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rosie Casals winning 2 times and Eva Lundquist being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Rosie Casals winning 4 and Eva Lundquist winning 0.
The last match between Rosie Casals and Eva Lundquist was at the Stockholm 2, 26-11-1969, Round: R4, Surface: Carpet, with Rosie Casals getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rosie Casals has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Eva Lundquist has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rosie Casals has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eva Lundquist has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Rosie Casals has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eva Lundquist has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Rosie Casals vs Eva Lundquist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Casals vs E. Lundquist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Casals	Stats	E. Lundquist
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	10
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Casals Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Aurora - 11-02-1991
R3 Andrea LeandA. Leand	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Hilton Head - 02-04-1990
R2 Halle CioffiH. Cioffi	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
San Diego - 31-07-1989
R3 Jo DurieJ. Durie	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Hilton Head - 03-04-1989
R2 Linda FerrandoL. Ferrando	L	6-0 6-0	Stats
Hilton Head - 04-04-1988
R2 Judith WiesnerJ. Wiesner	L	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

E. Lundquist Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bastad - 05-07-1971
R4 Odile De RoubinO. De	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Roland Garros - 24-05-1971
R2 Margaret CourtM. Court	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Bremen - 30-01-1971
R4 Heidi ReetmeyerH. Reetmeyer	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
Nell TrumanN. Truman	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Osaka - 02-11-1970
SF Kazuko SawamatsuK. Sawamatsu	L	6-0 4-6 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Casals vs E. Lundquist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Casals	Stats	E. Lundquist
65.68% (819/428)	YTD Win/Loss	40.91% (63/91)
62.73% (1757/1044)	Sets Win/Loss	42.49% (147/199)
100.00% (14282/0)	Games Win/Loss	47.85% (1550/1689)
66.23% (200/102)	Hard Win/Loss	46.15% (6/7)
67.35% (132/64)	Clay Win/Loss	42.39% (39/53)
62.24% (211/128)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (5/5)
66.51% (143/72)	Grass Win/Loss	29.41% (5/12)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
61.77	Average Opponent Rank	3.58
71.93% (41/16)	Slam W/L	40.00% (8/12)
69.23% (9/4)	Cups W/L	50.00% (1/1)
69.40% (127/56)	Futures W/L	12.50% (1/7)
66% (789/1204)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	40% (60/150)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
48% (32/67)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
56% (204/367)	Deciding Set Win %	40% (17/43)
88% (784/686)	1st Set Won, Won Match	77% (65/50)
12% (784/96)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	23% (65/15)
26% (443/117)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (86/10)